Discuter:John Duns Scot

Un article de Wikipédia, l'encyclopédie libre.

[modifier] Inexactitudes ?

Sur ce blog en anglais, on peut lire (au sujet de l'article de la Wikipedia française) :

"The wiki is inaccurate; though their list of Scotus's works at the end is fairly good, they use the De rerum principio in the body, known for the past 80 years to be by Vital du Four. And the bit about skepticism is silly too; one would think skepticism refers to knowledge of reality, not the faith-reason discussion. But it's true, Scotus doesn't think that given the canons of knowledge in the posterior analytics, stuff like divine omnipotence, imortality of the soul can be proved by reason alone. But thomas himself sometimes punts on some of these issues, such as numerical identity of the body of christ before and after death which can't be maintained with a unicity of substantial form."

Je ne connais pas la question, mais je me dis que ça intéressera peut-être ceux qui la connaissent.

Marvoir 27 juillet 2007 à 18:20 (CEST)