Geoffrey Miller (psychologue)

Un article de Wikipédia, l'encyclopédie libre.


Geoffrey Miller psychologue évolutionniste américain largement reconnu, dont les travaux sont dans la lignée de scientifique tels que Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett et Steven Pinker. Selon Miller, l'évolution n'est pas seulement guidée par la sélection de survie, mais par un processus tout aussi important que Darwin appela sélection sexuelle.

Pour démontrer son avis sur la sélection sexuelle, il a écrit The mating Mind, qui explique comment le choix sexuel donne forme à l'évolution de la nature humaine. Cela reprend et développe la suggestion de Darwin selon laquelle la selection sexuelle à travers le choix du partenaire a été importante dans l'évolution mentale de l'être humain (notamment les aspects où le comportement humain semble s'exprimer le plus de lui-même, tels l'art, la morale, le langage et la créativité). On a démontré que les critères de sélection en faveur de l'évolution était assez vague, mais les particularités de l'adaptation suggèrent qu'ils évoluent à travers les choix de partenaires mutuels des deux sexes, pour promouvoir l'intelligence, la créativité, le caractère et la forme physique héréditaire.


The supporting evidence includes human mate preferences, courtship behaviour, behaviour genetics, psychometrics, and life history patterns. The theory makes many testable predictions, and sheds new light on human cognition, motivation, communication, sexuality, and culture.

Miller believes that our minds evolved not as survival machines, but as courtship machines, and proposes that the human mind's most impressive abilities are courtship tools, which evolved to attract and entertain sexual partners. By switching from a survival-centred to a courtship-centred view of evolution, he attempts to show how we can understand the mysteries of mind. The main competing theories of human mental evolution are (1) selection for generalist foraging ability (i.e., hunting and gathering), as embodied in the work of researchers such as Hillard Kaplan and Kim Hill at the University of New Mexico, and (2) selection for social intelligence, as argued by Andrew Whiten, Robin Dunbar, and Simon Baron-Cohen.

He has published on visual perception, cognition, learning, robotics, neural networks, genetic algorithms, human mate choice, evolutionary game theory, and the origins of language, music, culture, intelligence, ideology, and consciousness. In particular, he studies human mental adaptations for judgment, decision-making, strategic behaviour, and communication in social and sexual domains. Apart from mutual mate-choice and sexual selection theory, this includes work on:

  • human mental traits as fitness indicators (reliable cues of underlying phenotypic traits and genetic quality);
  • social attribution heuristics, as adapted to the statistical structure of individual differences (including genetic and phenotypic covariances);
  • animate motion perception mechanisms, as adapted to typical patterns of intentional movement; and
  • consumer behavior (applications of evolutionary psychology in product design and aesthetics, marketing, advertising, branding, and the use of genetic algorithims for interactive online product design).

His clinical interests are the application of fitness indicator theory to understand the symptoms, demographics, and behaviour genetics of schizophrenia and mood disorders. His other interests include the origins of human preferences, aesthetics, utility functions, human strategic behaviour, game theory, experiment-based economics, the ovulatory effects on female mate preferences, and the intellectual legacies of Darwin, Nietzsche, and Veblen.

Ses recherches ont provoqué un large débat médiatique. Actuellement, il est assistant Professeur de Psychologie à l'Université du Nouveau Mexique. He is currently writing his second book, Faking fitness: The evolutionary origins of consumer behavior.

[modifier] Références

Autres langues