Discuter:Rolf Hochhuth

Un article de Wikipédia, l'encyclopédie libre.

	Rolf Hochhuth fait partie du projet télévision qui a pour but de coordonner les efforts sur l'ensemble des articles portant sur la télévision, de compléter l'arborescence et d'améliorer son portail dédié. Vous pouvez contribuer en vous référant à la page du projet. Pour toutes questions ou remarques, laissez-nous un message.
Ébauche	Cet article a été classé comme d'Avancement ébauche selon le Tableau d'avancement du projet. (Voir les statistiques)
À évaluer	Cet article a été classé comme d'Importance ? selon le Tableau d'importance du projet. (Contester ?)

[modifier] The neutrality of this article's subject matter is disputed

It is highly remarkable that exactly at the time that the sanctification procedure for Pius XII initiated in 1965 has been resumed and the Vatican's Congregation for the Causes of Saints presented an outline for a decree to classify Pius XII as "adorable" to Benedict XVI in 2007, activities to defame Pius critic Rolf Hochhuth are highly en vogue again. These activities include Ion Mihai Pacepas strongly suggestive but less strongly investigated article on “The Deputy” („National Review“, Jan. 25, 2007 [1]. German conservative historian Thomas Brechenmacher strongly challenged the plausibility of Pacepa with reference to numerous inconsistencies in the foremost German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, cf. "Hochhuths Quellen. War der 'Stellvertreter' vom KGB inspiriert?", in: FAZ, April 26, 2007). This systematic defamation also includes acts such as the addition of a polemical photograph of Hochhuth and David Irving in this article on Hochhuth... Do sacred ends actually justify every means in Wikipedia? --Diggindeeper / 89.53.250.197 (d) 20 décembre 2007 à 23:43 (CET)

The polemical picture was removed and replaced with external links pointing to "neutral" pictures, the mention of Pacepa's story disappeared long ago, and the article was expanded with Hochhuth's works, prizes, and bibliographical information - more relevant than the previous defamating comments. Moumine 15 avril 2008 à 15:37 (CEST)